The Pulmonology Reimbursement Landscape
Cognitive work is squeezed. The dollars — and the risk — have moved to what you administer and test.
In pulmonology, the office and ICU visit pays less in real terms every year — while the economics that decide the practice increasingly sit in the drugs you buy and bill, the diagnostics you own, and the authorizations you must win.
Medicare's physician fee schedule carries no automatic inflation update, so the conversion factor erodes evaluation-and-management and critical-care payment against rising labor and overhead. Meanwhile the revenue base has shifted toward technical and ancillary lines — pulmonary function testing, bronchoscopy including EBUS and navigational procedures, and sleep testing — and toward high-cost biologics for severe asthma administered under buy-and-bill, where ASP-based margins are thin and specialty pharmacy is steadily carving volume away.
Every one of these dollars is exposed. Prior authorization gates biologics, advanced imaging, and diagnostics; site-of-service and specialty-pharmacy mandates move infusions off the practice's books; and antifibrotics for interstitial lung disease, home oxygen and DME, and CPAP all sit inside tightening payer policy. The same patient panel can be worth dramatically different amounts depending on how it is coded, contracted, and defended — and that is precisely where Fulcrum works.
Illustrative composition. Replace with your confirmed figures before launch; reflects current CMS/MedPAC methodology and public payer data, 2024–2026.