The PM&R Reimbursement Landscape
The revenue base is broad. The pressure is on every line of it.
Physiatry is one of medicine's most diversified professional P&Ls — and that diversity is both the opportunity and the exposure. The margin lives in the procedures you capture, the drug you buy and bill, and the therapy you own.
A single physiatry practice can bill office and consultative E/M, electrodiagnostics (EMG/NCS), interventional spine and joint injections, spasticity management with botulinum toxin under buy-and-bill, and therapy (PT/OT) as an ancillary line — each governed by its own coverage rules, edits, and payer policy. Electrodiagnostic complexity is routinely under-documented, injection reimbursement swings on site-of-service, and buy-and-bill economics turn on acquisition cost versus allowable. The result is a revenue base that is rich in aggregate but leaks quietly, line by line.
Layered on top are prior-authorization regimes and therapy medical-necessity thresholds signaled by the KX modifier, workers'-compensation and out-of-network dynamics, prosthetics, orthotics, and DME, and — for IRF-affiliated groups — the discipline of the IRF PPS and the 60% Rule. As orthopedics and pain platforms consolidate and post-acute shifts toward functional-outcome and value-based models, the same physiatrist can be worth dramatically different amounts depending on how the full base is coded, contracted, and defended. That is precisely where Fulcrum works.
Illustrative composition. Replace with your confirmed figures before launch; reflects current CMS/MedPAC methodology and public payer data, 2024–2026.